Vacuum cleaner Philips FC7088 AquaTrio Pro

Ranked 1st in the ranking:

Top Premium Vertical Vacuum Cleaners

Go to rating

Specifications Vacuum cleaner Philips FC7088 AquaTrio Pro

General characteristics

A type vertical
Cleaning dry and wet
Power consumption 500 watts
Dust collector bagless (cyclone filter), 0.65 l capacity
Power regulator not
Fine filter there is
Power cord length 8 m

Equipment

Nozzles included 2 microfiber rotating brushes

Dimensions and weight

Vacuum cleaner dimensions (WxDxH) 32×30.5×115 cm
Weight 6.7 kg

Functions

Opportunities the ability to connect an electric brush
Additional Information range 9.5m; the possibility of using detergents; tank capacity for dirty water 0.8l; can use any detergent or clean water

Philips Vacuum Cleaner Reviews FC7088 AquaTrio Pro

Pluses: Washes well, sucks hair in a container.
Minuses: Regular brush replacement Dragging the cord on the floor Limited space for surface cleaning. Near skirting boards / walls cannot be removed, as the case will not allow it implement.
Minuses: Acquired this mop in 2016 in November month. A week after use, when using approximately For 10-15 minutes, the jam indicator in the brushes lights up! By phone technical support responded that the hair was wound on the brushes. Although the hair was not wound! We were taken to a service center. the diagnosis of breakdowns was not revealed. I had to exploit like that as it is. Because it was impossible to prove that it turns off as if overheating after about 10-15 minutes of continuous mopping the floor. I had to give her a break, then she turned on anew, as if nothing had happened. Some time not exploited, dispensed with it. Taking her out again she generally did not turn on! 2 red indicators lit up when pressed wash buttons! Took to the service center 12/05/2017 warranty repair issued the goods 09.01.2018 Brush replaced coupling assy, ​​Drive train assy. Dabrav from the service center and tying home when using saw that it became even louder to work, and besides to wash with stains. With plentiful stripes of water. Once again I made a request to the service center, firstly not all the bolts screwed after repair, made a video of how it washes, photo. They offered to bring it back for repair. Due to the fact that the device is not quite light and still need to be driven far could not be immediately taken. I took it on 02/14/2018, and on 02/19/2018 I received an SMS saying that I would take apparatus. They issued an act saying that there is a malfunction, but under warranty will not do. Kogdp I knew again on the hotline to me They answered that they removed the guarantee since I did not think the mop correctly exploited. The container is supposedly dirty right down to that I brought it with dirty water) the service center sent them photographs-photo report, in order to whitewash themselves, they themselves washed with my mop floors and a container of dirty water were sent away) scuffs on case, chip on the handle) supposedly brushes are outdated) although I had them in November acquired 2017! And due to the fact that the device did not work I didn’t use them (brushes). Found a reason not to hold More service repair under warranty. They gave me my poor in general the beauty is all dirty. In sand. And still not done. Sediment huge. I don’t even want to mess with them anymore. And Philips is not interested in their customers.

The user has hidden his data


Pluses: Good quality cleaning. Time reduction cleaning, as you do not need to pre-sweep or vacuum before mopping.
Disadvantages: I bought this model of a vacuum cleaner in April 2016. IN August 2017, the vacuum cleaner broke during the next cleaning: the head of the vacuum cleaner, in which the rotating interchangeable brushes. I drove a couple of days after the breakdown to an authorized Philips service center. Philips recognized this failure as not guaranteed case. September 13, 2017 sent the claim in the order pre-trial settlement of the dispute. Now I’m waiting for an answer. Before that was one more minor breakdown: the latch on the tank fell off for pure water. He repaired himself with glue-second.
Minuses: I purchased a vacuum cleaner on April 30, 2016 for 34,999 rub. During use, I had to change two sets of brushes + 4 000 rub. In the reviews here I also found the cost of such a repair (the brush fell off) = 11,000 rubles. Cost of owning a vacuum cleaner (39 000 rub / 15) + 11 000 = 3 333 rubles. per month. Right someone here I noticed that it’s cheaper to hire a cleaner for that kind of money. Vacuum cleaner not worth the money spent on it. The design is flimsy and short-lived. Plus nerves and money in connection with the attempt repair the vacuum cleaner under warranty.

Zhukov Denis


Pluses: Well launders from the first pass. Enough easy to clean it.
Disadvantages: Along the wall leaves an unwashed area, because the brush is much narrower than the body. The supply and reception tanks are too small.
Disadvantages: Played and successfully sold. Better to mop, less trouble. Maybe for huge areas this is the way out, but for an ordinary apartment is more than a roar.

serwww


Pluses: A great option if there are no carpets at all, only tile and laminate flooring.
Minuses: Leaves a strip. Does not clean linoleum. The most the main thing is that it broke the next year after the end of the warranty, moreover, the most expensive unit is the engine. Hence the conclusion – the engines in this model are bad, with defects.
Disadvantages: If not for the breakdown in general, I would be pleased.

Mityukov Andrey


Pluses: I liked that the idea is good and when the vacuum cleaner works, it really makes life easier. For a mother with many children became salvation
Disadvantages: Poorly executed products. Lid mount – a thin plastic pin. After 4 months daily The use of the mount is broken. The service said that not Warranty case, refused to repair, forced to pay for diagnostics. Repair costs have not been announced. Nahamili. Eventually, after bickering, they said that the item was not delivered to Russia. Those. now the vacuum cleaner for more than 30 thousand can be thrown away. Cost use of 8 thousand per month. Cheaper to hire a cleaner.
Minuses: In general, the idea is 5, execution 2. And work with their service specialists. You can’t work with clients like that. I will write a complaint to Rospotrebnadzor

zvezdunova


Pluses: All flaws can be forgiven for the sake of cleanliness which gives this unit
Minuses: Broke. Dozens of user broke the neck fixing the lower platform to the handle. All no matter what, but repair impossible in principle! 30k in a bucket, just nonsense. No warranty, neither paid nor what. To the urn

Ogiy Igor


Advantages: Does not require preliminary dusting before mopping. Washes quite clean.
Minuses: Very weak plastic on the critical assembly articulations of the handle and brushes! Slightly turned sideways, and this is inevitable, plastics breaks down. Repair costs a lot of money. It’s done intentionally. It was possible to pick up plastic more firmly. Scam! Tiny neck on the part on which the movable mechanism is mounted brushes, developing 6500 rpm. Exactly literate scam engineer will not allow himself such nasty things. Obviously intentional idea.
Disadvantages: The overall impression is good, but without knowing the disadvantages, You may soon be disappointed. Or sooo gently work with him, not allowing children to vacuum, or cook money …

Nevolin evgeny


Pluses: Convenience in use, flooring tiles and laminate cleans dryly, even the child was happy to clean. Removable containers washed and all.
Minuses: I bought it by pre-order, worked for 3 years and disconnected. Fairly expensive thing and so little exploited. Previously bought replacement brushes, constantly washed and looked after, nothing helped. The plastic fell off in the handle and stopped start-up work, they fixed it themselves, then the brushes stopped spinning, they need to be turned manually for a long time and tediously for about 20 minutes to start, otherwise it just turns off. It turns out that you need to spend more time to start the vacuum cleaner in work.
Minuses: Extremely disappointed. It is unfortunate that so few worked out.

Borisova Natalya


Advantages: With this model, the main type of floor cleaning in apartment (with two cats!) – not dry, but high-quality wet cleaning! For 10-15 minutes, 40 m2 of floor in the apartment is washed to a shine!
Minuses: When buying, please note: the vacuum cleaner is suitable only for mopping, not for carpets and furniture! CLEAN PLASTIC! SERVICE IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION – VERY EXPENSIVE! The containers have flimsy blue clips and the plastic latches themselves to him. On the bottom – almost immediately after the purchase, the pin broke fastenings, on the top – the plastic latches broke, so The blue clip is now hanging just for the view. For a year and a half use (official warranty-24months): had to be changed a glass for detergent, it just fell apart into 2 components (3200 rubles!), After that the connecting lower platform fell off and top flap cover pin. THE MANUFACTURER APPROVES THAT IT IS – NOT WARRANTY CASE! Repair involves a complete replacement of the bottom platforms (11,200 rubles !!!).
Disadvantages: This vacuum cleaner, alas, so far the only more or less quality offer on the market regarding wet floor cleaning in apartment. The main advantage is the presence of rotating polishing brushes, providing not only suction of garbage, but also flushing the floor with clean water at the same time, and dirty water right there sucked into a collection glass! There is a clear advantage over existing steam mops, washing robotic vacuum cleaners and other models of washing vacuum cleaners. Plus – design and functionality thought out to the smallest detail, the vacuum cleaner is very convenient for me in operation.

The user has hidden his data


Pluses: Wet floor cleaning. Very clean!
Disadvantages: cord. the cord lies on the floor, not in the vacuum cleaner ((
Minuses: I like it!

The user has hidden his data



Rate article
An online magazine about style, fashion, etiquette, lifestyle, and about choosing the best products and services.
Leave a Reply