12 of the best sofa fillings

Review of the best according to the editorial board. On the selection criteria. This material is subjective and does not constitute advertising and does not serve as a purchase guide. Before buying, you need to consult with a specialist.

When choosing a soft sofa, it is important to pay attention not only to the design and size, but also the reliability of the model. One of the most important parameters is the definition of the filler. Durability and many other qualities of furniture depend on its type.

We've compiled a list of the best sofa 'fillings' to help potential consumers get a quality purchase. When selecting participants, the following criteria were taken into account:

  1. resistance to loads;
  2. life time;
  3. orthopedic effect;
  4. air exchange;
  5. rigidity;
  6. ease of installation;
  7. cost;
  8. reviews on the Internet;
  9. mold resistance;
  10. hypoallergenic.

It is necessary to study the advantages and disadvantages of various furniture fillers. Otherwise, after a few years, you will have to observe squeezed seats and loss of shape at the back. And this is a serious blow to the wallet.

Rating of the best fillers for sofas

Nomination a place filler rating
The best spring fillers for sofas 1 Block of independent springs 5.0
2 Spring block 'Bonnel' 4.9
3 Spring block 'Snake' 4.8
The best springless synthetic sofas 1 Structofiber 5.0
2 Synthepukh 4.9
3 Holofider 4.8
4 Comforrel 4.7
5 Polyurethane foam 4.6
6 Durafil 4.5
The best springless sofa fillers of natural origin 1 Sea grass 5.0
2 Periotec 4.9
3 Horsehair 4.8

The best spring fillers for sofas

Spring structures can be found in budget models. For softening, the filler is lined with special materials. Let's take a closer look at similar products.

Block of independent springs

Rating: 5.0

Block of independent springs

Independent springs are quiet and durable. They provide comfortable use and are ideal for classic beds. Externally, these are horizontal, strong cases with columnar spirals. Usually they are made of fiberteck or spunbond. Each element individually takes the load and contributes to the repetition of the body shape.

The service life is about 10 years. It is possible to choose a sofa depending on the weight of the owner. The advantages include the orthopedic effect, reliability, safety and optimal microclimate. Such a filler is more expensive than other structures.

Advantages

  • flexible;
  • long period of operation;
  • excellent microclimate;
  • high ergonomics;
  • body comfort.

disadvantages

  • not.

Spring block 'Bonnel'

Rating: 4.9

Spring block 'Bonnel'

Next in the ranking is a volumetric frame made of strong wire with frames. The structural parts are intertwined in the form of cones. Such designs have been on the market for over 50 years. They are chosen for their reliability, affordable price, optimal moisture exchange.

The service life is approximately 7 years. “Bonnel” can withstand heavy loads and does not impede air circulation. The owners of sofas with this filler warn that the springs can squeak.

Advantages

  • reasonable price;
  • good air exchange;
  • withstands an impressive weight;
  • reliability.

disadvantages

  • creaking possible.

Spring block 'Snake'

Rating: 4.8

Spring block 'snake'

The 'Snake' system consists of parallel wave springs. They are usually made of high carbon alloys. The main advantages of the filler are noiselessness, long term of use, and optimal ventilation.

The spring block is easily and quickly attached to the furniture frame. It has an anti-corrosion coating and is able to remember the shape of the body. Buyers note some inconveniences in operation, the need for individual installation in folding models.

Advantages

  • noiselessness;
  • the service life reaches 20 years;
  • memorizing body shape;
  • anti-corrosion coating.

disadvantages

  • unsatisfactory amortization qualities.

The best springless synthetic sofas

Springless fillers provide sofas with elasticity and softness. Usually, such items are not cheap.

Structofiber

Rating: 5.0

Structofiber

The nomination opens with a patented three-layer Struttofiber filler. The middle one has vertically spaced fibers to accommodate the load. It is a durable material that will not rot. It is affordable and recovers quickly after deformation.

Structofiber is praised for its elasticity, moisture protection and hypoallergenicity. It does not support fire in the event of ignition and does not provoke insect reproduction. The main disadvantage of the filler is the complexity of the repair. When choosing a filling, you need to pay attention to the rigidity of the raw material. The less the customer's weight, the softer the material should be.

Advantages

  • does not cause allergies;
  • has orthopedic characteristics;
  • easy recovery;
  • durability;
  • a lot of approving reviews;
  • adequate price.

disadvantages

  • complex repair.

Synthepukh

Rating: 4.9

Synthepukh

The nomination continues for the siliconized polyester fiber. This is a good replacement for natural down with a reasonable price tag. The synthetic fluff has minimal weight and excellent flexibility. Soft raw materials are environmentally friendly and durable. It is protected from moisture and does not roll.

The filler 'breathes' well. He quickly regains its shape. It is permissible to wash the synthetic fluff in a typewriter on a delicate cycle. It dries up instantly. With frequent washing, its thermal insulation properties will decrease.

Advantages

  • ecological cleanliness;
  • keeping the shape;
  • hypoallergenic;
  • excellent breathability;
  • warm and lightweight;
  • long term of use.

disadvantages

  • after washing it loses its properties.

Holofider

Rating: 4.8

Holofider

Next in the ranking is a modern filler for sofas made of padding polyester. It is realized in the form of plates or balls. Lightweight and durable material has elasticity and optimal resilience. Holofider is an environmentally friendly raw material that does not burn.

The filler can be used for 10 years. It has excellent soundproofing properties, it does not cause allergies, and it quickly recovers during deformation. The raw material does not get infected with fungus and does not rot. The main disadvantage is the overpriced.

Advantages

  • no allergies;
  • does not give in to decay;
  • high degree of wear resistance;
  • passes air flows.

disadvantages

  • high cost.

Comforrel

Rating: 4.7

Comforrel

Synthetic raw materials are made from polyester fibers. It is coated with antibacterial agents. Comforl is chosen for its light weight, easy care, excellent heat retention, breathability.

The material does not cake over time and is suitable for washing in a machine. He has no serious flaws. If you compare it with the previous member of the rating, then it wears out faster.

Advantages

  • ease of care;
  • ease;
  • excellent breathability;
  • affordable price.

disadvantages

  • quick wear compared to other fillers.

Polyurethane foam

Rating: 4.6

Polyurethane foam

PU foam can be purchased in the form of cast forms or blocks. The first option is poured into the finished sofa with a liquid composition, and the second is cut out according to the shape of the furniture. On sale there are polyurethane foams of various hardness. The service life reaches 10 years.

They praise the high reliability of raw materials, low prices, safety and environmental friendliness. The filler does not collect dust and does not cause an allergic reaction. It can withstand heavy loads for a long time. It is recommended to cover the polyurethane foam from sunlight.

Advantages

  • withstands long loads;
  • breathability;
  • acceptable price;
  • long service life.

disadvantages

  • afraid of the sun's rays.

Durafil

Rating: 4.5

Durafil

Durafil is produced on the basis of polyester, which is similar in effect to spring blocks. Splendor, lightness, flexibility and elasticity are the main characteristics of the raw material. The advantages include the environmental friendliness of the filler and its acceptable cost.

Durafil has antimicrobial properties and does not collect dust. It does not burn and is not afraid of moisture. The material requires periodic cleaning. Mites or moths can grow in it.

Advantages

  • antimicrobial characteristics;
  • reasonable price;
  • moisture resistance;
  • the development of an allergic reaction is excluded.

disadvantages

  • the need for cleansing.

The best springless sofa fillers of natural origin

The third nomination includes the best fillers from natural raw materials. They are in great demand among buyers.

Sea grass

Rating: 5.0

Sea grass

Sea grass is created by gluing seaweed together. They are woven into burlap and, under the influence of temperature, release iodine with a pleasant aroma. Thus, there is a healing effect on health.

Sea grass does not cause allergies and is bactericidal. Pleased with the affordable price, long period of use, orthopedic effect. Judging by the reviews, such a filler improves well-being and makes you sleep better. This product has no downsides.

Advantages

  • orthopedic qualities;
  • improvement of well-being;
  • environmental friendliness;
  • strength;
  • optimal rigidity.

disadvantages

  • not.

Periotec

Rating: 4.9

Periotec

Periotec looks like two reinforced layers and one carrier. The outer elements are made of natural fibers, while the middle ones are made of cotton or polyester. Strengths include elasticity, harmlessness, long operational period.

Periotec is praised for a high degree of comfort, an adequate price tag. The air in the filler circulates freely. Unlike other fillers in the ranking, this material crumples faster than others.

Advantages

  • softness;
  • good warming properties;
  • inexpensive material;
  • not afraid of moisture.

disadvantages

  • crumples faster than others.

Horsehair

Rating: 4.8

Horsehair

The last participant in the rating is a filler based on hair from a horse's tail or mane. Sometimes latex is added to it to increase elasticity. This is a common option for premium furniture.

The advantages include rapid evaporation of moisture, orthopedic effect and breathability. Horsehair does not collect dust particles and prevents pathogenic microorganisms from multiplying. Not everyone can afford such a filling. This is perhaps its only drawback.

Advantages

  • environmentally friendly;
  • optimal degree of rigidity;
  • flexibility;
  • does not collect dust;
  • will last a long time.

disadvantages

  • not everyone can afford it.


Attention! This rating is subjective and does not constitute an advertisement and does not serve as a purchase guide. Before buying, you need to consult with a specialist.

Rate article
An online magazine about style, fashion, etiquette, lifestyle, and about choosing the best products and services.
Add a comment