11 best 65-inch TVs

Review of the best according to the editors. About the selection criteria. The the material is subjective, is not advertising and is not serves as a guide to the purchase. Before purchase is needed consultation with a specialist.

65-inch TVs have become a kind of compromise for users: on the one hand, their display is large enough for comfortable watching TV programs, and on the other, such models are not too expensive. At the present stage, they are all equipped with a function Smart TV: the only difference is on which platform it is implemented.

Since this market segment has become very popular for last 2 years, the editorial staff of the magazine ranked 11 most the best TVs at 65 inches. For selection of goods in the final The list used the following characteristics:

  1. image transmission quality;
  2. sound system implementation;
  3. the presence of progressive functions;
  4. reviews of owners and conclusions of staff experts;
  5. reliability parameters;
  6. compliance of the basic functionality with the requested price.

Analysis of technical characteristics was made on the resource rankquality.com.

Rating of the best TVs at 65 inches

Nomination a place Name of product price
Rating of the best TVs at 65 inches 1 OLED LG OLED65W9P 338 790 rub.
2 QLED Samsung QE65Q90RAU 148 790 rub.
3 NanoCell LG 65SM9800 102 369 rub.
4 QLED Samsung QE65Q67RAU 94 990 rub.
5 Panasonic TX-65GXR900 85 990 rub.
6 LG 65UU661H 55 555 rub.
7 Samsung UE65RU7200U 62 990 rub.
8 LG 65UM7450 54 025 rub.
9 Toshiba 65U5855EC 44 540 rub.
10 TCL L65P6US 49 990 rub.
11 BBK 65LEX-8127 / UTS2C 38 989 rub.


Rating: 4.9


The choice between two equivalent candidates was very difficult, but as a result, the first line of the rating went to LG OLED65W9P. Actually, it is a complete alternative to Samsung QE65Q90RAU with slightly modified equivalent functions. So, instead of the ecosystem from Yandex, this TV supports LG Smart ThinQ, and sound provide the same 6 speakers with subwoofer and Dolby Atmos, only from another brand. By the way, they are made by a separate panel, reducing weight devices for unhindered installation on the mounted bracket.

According to experts, to spot the difference between competing models can only be with knowledge of how televisions should work with OLED and QLED matrices. Image refresh rate in LG OLED65W9P also makes 100 Hz with program increase to 200. There is virtual reality support, display dimming mode, remote control Remote control and voice control. And here is the quantity The internal memory here is 8 GB, which is why the model works Significantly faster than the opponent. However, compensate for this plus huge price can – it is it that is a deterrent for consumers.


  • full technological and technical equipment in accordance with requirements of modern standards;
  • remote soundbar that facilitates the device for wall mounts;
  • the presence of voice control;
  • Great design
  • highest image quality.


  • the price for a TV reaches 335 thousand rubles.

QLED Samsung QE65Q90RAU

Rating: 4.8


Samsung QE65Q90RAU walked in the footsteps of QE65Q67RAU, fixing some flaws and going into the category of premium screens at 65 inches. Its main feature: the combination of magnificent image quality with stunning sound that is provided 6 speakers with a total power of 60 watts. Together with tweeters, model contains a compact subwoofer and has a receiving system Surround Sound – Not Every Home Stereo System Can compete with such a set.

As for the other aspects of TV, here everything is completely identical to QE65Q67RAU: go down to line 4 of the rating and repeat passed. The only difference is even greater bulkiness (35 kg with stand) and power consumption (255 Tue). The rest does not need a special introduction.


  • high-quality sound system upgrade: 6 speakers + subwoofer;
  • 200 Hz Motion Rate, High Quality Picture Index frequency of 3.7 kHz;
  • the presence of a dimming system Direct Full Array Elite;
  • belongs to the Yandex Smart Home ecosystem;
  • It has voice control and a decorative Ambient mode.


  • bulky TV high enough power consumption.

NanoCell LG 65SM9800

Rating: 4.7

NANOCELL LG 65SM9800.jpg

This screen relies on manufacturability and an abundance of attractive functions. But among users, the proper response, alas, cannot be found. smog. The blame for the “one-sidedness” of the creators who do not care about external data for the revolutionary filling. Replace the TFT IPS matrix with QLED, and all problems are resolved! But no: we are content with what we have. But with local dimming features, Dolby support Vision, HDR10 and Ultra HD 4k, as well as with a screen refresh rate of 100 Hz

In addition to entering the ecosystem of LG Smart ThinQ and a whole set LG 65SM9800 relies on quality for innovative features sounding. That is why the two standard speakers were two more were added, and their total power became equal to 40 watts. Given automatic volume equalization, surround support sound, Dolby Atmos and the presence of a subwoofer, nothing an additional stereo system is not worth talking. It is worth noting and the presence of a voice control device, 2 GB of internal memory, as well as the True Motion system, which increases the frequency screen updates up to 200 Hz. The revolutionary thing.


  • special emphasis on sound quality (4 x 10 W speakers + subwoofer and a set of additional functions);
  • part of the LG Smart ThinQ ecosystem;
  • includes more than a dozen advanced features;
  • the presence of voice control.


  • TFT IPS matrix.

QLED Samsung QE65Q67RAU

Rating: 4.7


Slowly but surely, we got to the QLED TVs. Samsung QE65Q67RAU is one of the brightest representatives of this segment, received the highest quality rating from Russian buyers. It is based on the Tizen system through which it is implemented Smart TV technology. Among the useful features include image transfer standards in Ultra HD 4k and HDR10 +, as well as the availability progressive scan.

Like all Samsung representatives, the QE65Q67RAU is different bulky (26 kg) and high power consumption (203 watts). However it implements a couple of cool solutions:

  1. Ambient mode, which allows the TV to fit seamlessly into environment;
  2. Ultimate UHD Dimming function
  3. Motion Rate up to 200 frame rates Hz;
  4. Smart Home system, thanks to which it can enter Yandex Smart Home ecosystem.
  5. In view of such opportunities, the price tag of almost 100 thousand rubles It looks quite justified.


  • visual style changed for the better;
  • an abundance of a number of additional functions;
  • Picture Quality Index with a frequency of 3.3 kHz;
  • The optimum ratio of price and quality.


  • bulky high-power TV.

Panasonic TX-65GXR900

Rating: 4.6


Panasonic TX-65GXR900 is a pretty interesting LED TV. On the one hand, he has more modest personal settings for displaying pictures. On the other: him progressiveness goes to a new level. Among the formats of work not only Ultra HD 4k, but also HDR10, HDR10 +, and even Dolby Vision. Along with smart backlighting, it has a local function Local Dimming screen dimming and dynamic scene index reaches a value of 1600 points.

In addition to the standard set of 2×10 W Panasonic speakers TX-65GXR900 has built-in digital receivers and a whole set connection ports (including HDMI, USB, AV and component entrance). There is support for Dolby Atmos technology, which allows Get high-quality stereo sound without an additional headset. The only serious drawback of the model can be called a lot of weight. (27.5 kilograms), which can negatively affect desire hang the tv on the wall.


  • availability of support for Dolby functions (Vision and Atmos);
  • local dimming of the screen is present;
  • built-in light sensor;
  • surround sound;
  • high quality color reproduction.


  • a lot of weight.

LG 65UU661H

Rating: 4.5

LG 65UU661H.png

Sixth line of LG 65UU661H due to high quality as with reliability point of view, and in terms of functionality. Despite 50 Hz frame rate model provides excellent technical parameters, including for flexible user settings display pictures. Brightness adjustable up to 500 cd / m2, there is a progressive scan, and the viewing angle is 178 °.

Unlike its previous competitor, this screen has no affinity. with the Smart Home system, however supports VR 360 and has Pro software: Centric – an exclusive development from LG company. Otherwise, the differences are minimal: the sound system lost support for Dolby, the TV itself began to consume 177 watts energy and “threw off” a couple of extra pounds. By design significantly superior to Samsung’s UE65RU7200U – argue with the obvious pointless.


  • support for virtual reality technology;
  • relatively light weight (21 kg);
  • wide range of brightness settings;
  • catchy corporate design.


  • large price differentiation (from 75 to 128 thousand rubles);
  • lack of support for Dolby Atmos technology.

Samsung UE65RU7200U

Rating: 4.5

SAMSUNG UE65RU7200U2.jpg

An important difference between the Samsung UE65RU7200U and the LG 65UM740 is that the first can be connected not only to the company ecosystem of Samsung SmartThings, but also to the “Smart Home” from Yandex. IN In connection with this, the voice assistant Alice is preinstalled on them, which works much better than LG’s basic assistant.

The rest of the model almost completely repeats the possibilities opponent, except that the image transmission quality is better (with that same refresh rate of 100 Hz). But ergonomics is observed small problems. The fact is that to the already difficult The TV (25.1 kg) comes with a 3 kg stand. FROM on the one hand, it’s bad, but on the other, the leg can perform camouflage function – connection wires are hidden under it. We also note the inconvenient remote control and the “annoying” framework, not enough thin to be inconspicuous and not wide enough to leave questions about registration.


  • the ability to join Samsung’s internal ecosystem and “Smart home” from Yandex;
  • refresh rate 100 Hz;
  • acceptable sound quality.


  • problems with the ergonomics of the TV itself and the complete remote control.

LG 65UM7450

Rating: 4.4

LG 65UM7450.jpeg

Despite seemingly point changes, the difference between the LG 65UM740 and the previous competitor is very significant. Update frequency frames here is 100 Hz, there is a flicker suppression system and Direct LED backlight developed in LG laboratories. Note and many advanced features like helmet support virtual reality and voice control. Smart TV works on webOS and has a fast boot, especially when high speed uninterrupted internet connection.

The stereo system is similar to the Toshiba 65U5855EC and allows do without additional acoustics. By the way, the TV can enter the LG Smart ThinQ ecosystem and become part of the smart home. “The cost of the model varies greatly from a profitable 47 to the expected 66 thousand rubles – we recommend a good search for all available offers.


  • the ability to connect to the system of “smart home”;
  • refresh rate 100 Hz;
  • support for VR glasses;
  • control using voice commands.


  • recognition problems on some devices voice commands.

Toshiba 65U5855EC

Rating: 4.3

TOSHIBA 65U5855EC.jpg

We think the starting point for understanding important technical TV specifications given. We will focus on important aspects, keeping in mind that all their other characteristics are equal and identical. In the case of the Toshiba 65U5855EC can be noted weak run of contrast settings (total 1200: 1) and increased power consumption of 180 watts. Perhaps this is due with more powerful speakers installed (2×10 W) with decoders Dolby Digital and volume equalization function.

In this model, manufacturers refused to use standard LED, replacing it with the Direct-version of the backlight. It turned out better than TCL, but worse than LG and Samsung. IN The Android platform acts as the OS for Smart TV, and it works it is more stable than in BBK 65LEX-8127 / UTS2C.


  • powerful and stable Direct LED backlight;
  • loud surround sound;
  • stable operation of applications in Smart TV mode.


  • increased power consumption;
  • low contrast setting range.


Rating: 4.1

TCL L65P6US.jpg

The line above is the TV from TCL, gaining good user support. Compared to BBK’s competitor, he looks just great: supports not only 4k UHD, but also HDR 10, has a refresh rate of 60 Hz and based on the Linux system. The latter allows her to work well with applications, here are just setting broadcast options for many turns out to be too heavy.

By the way, despite the sophisticated look TCL L65P6US weighs about 22.5 kilogram. This fact must be taken into account both during installation and during transportation. Despite the same 2 speakers of 8 watts, this one sounds the TV screen option is much better than BBK: the reason for this is surround sound function with support for Dolby Atmos and DTS codecs. The model has a drive for recording TV shows, so you You can postpone watching your favorite series later, if suddenly serious matters will arise. The settings are also fine, here only 8 ms pixel delay has not gone anywhere.


  • very good stereo with surround support sound;
  • refresh rate 60 Hz;
  • the presence of a drive for recording programs;
  • wireless support.


  • inconvenient and complicated setup menu.

BBK 65LEX-8127 / UTS2C

Rating: 4.0

BBK 65LEX-8127UTS2C.jpg

BBK technology is gradually losing relevance in the circle domestic consumers, and the 65LEX-8127 / UTS2C TV did not a big exception to the rule. Despite the fact that its parameters, in overall similar to competitors, users were able to find several nuances. But first about the pros. It supports high format definition with a resolution of 4k UHD, has a pre-installed version Android Smart TV 2019, LED backlight and pre-installed DVB and Teletext signal receivers. By default, it is built in. 1100 channels, and for many this is a decisive factor in favor of purchases.

Built-in stereo BBK 65LEX-8127 / UTS2C can be called good: 2 8 W speakers produce high-quality sound, but a subwoofer or soundbar would not hurt. Image quality is also impressive: brightness adjustable in the range up to 300 cd / m2, contrast has a ratio of 4000: 1, and viewing angles are optimal (178 °). The refresh rate is generally neutral (50 Hz), but the response time A pixel of 8 ms can be called a slight flaw. Also note user dissatisfaction regarding performance installed applications – this means that 2 GB of RAM is simply not cope with the load.


  • relatively light weight: 19.3 kg;
  • 3 ports HDMI 2.0 and 2 USB;
  • good stereo sound (but it doesn’t hurt and full acoustic system).


  • friezes and freezes of installed applications are observed;
  • pixel response time.

Attention! This rating is subjective, is not advertising and does not serve as a guide to the purchase. Before the purchase consultation with a specialist is necessary.

Rate article
An online magazine about style, fashion, etiquette, lifestyle, and about choosing the best products and services.
Add a comment