16 most economical crossovers

Review of the best according to the editorial board. On the selection criteria. This material is subjective and does not constitute advertising and does not serve as a purchase guide. Before buying, you need to consult with a specialist.

In Russia, crossovers are in high demand. Experts explain the popularity of such cars with a high seating position, a comfortable interior and good cross-country ability. Since the body of the crossover is large enough, many motorists worry about fuel consumption when buying. In order to find an economical car, our experts advise you to pay attention to several points.

Recommendations for choosing a crossover

Engine's type. Most modern crossovers are still equipped with diesel or gasoline engines. Although the first electric cars have already appeared.

1. Diesel units are still slightly leading in terms of efficiency. But in the case of crossovers, they look more profitable in terms of pulling power, especially when you have to overcome serious off-road conditions. However, diesel maintenance will be more expensive.
2. Gasoline engines have proven themselves perfectly in the conditions of the Russian winter. Crossovers with large cabins warm up faster than a diesel engine. And the dynamics of acceleration in gasoline versions looks preferable. The maximum efficiency is demonstrated by hybrid motors, where the gasoline engine plays the first violin, and the electric motor provides the crossover with complete environmental friendliness.

Engine capacity. One of the important characteristics of the engine, which affects the economy, is the total volume of the combustion chambers. Many motorists mistakenly believe that the smaller this value, the more economical the engine will be. In fact, the balance of parameters such as power, car weight, transmission type and body streamlining is important. Therefore, the most economical in crossovers are power units with a volume of 1.4-2.0 liters.

Transmission type. Modern crossovers are equipped with both mechanical gearboxes and automatic (robotic) ones.

1. Experienced drivers can achieve the highest degree of fuel economy from manual transmission crossovers. It is important to change gears in a timely manner, maintaining the engine speed in the range of 2-3 thousand revolutions.
2. It is more profitable for novice motorists to buy cars with automatic transmission. This is especially true when most of the time you have to spend on city streets.

Drive unit. The type of crossover drive has a serious impact on fuel consumption.

1. All-wheel drive models are considered the most voracious. But such a car will not get stuck on a country road after the rain, it will save time, fuel and nerves.
2. For city driving or asphalt roads, buying a front-wheel drive crossover looks optimal. Due to the close arrangement of the motor and transmission from the wheels, torque is transmitted with minimal energy loss.

We have selected 16 of the most economical crossovers for review. Most of them can be purchased at car dealerships in Russia. When allocating seats, the editorial board of the magazine relied on the opinion of the expert community, taking into account the reviews of domestic car owners.

Rating of the most economical crossovers

Nomination	a place	Name of product	price	Consumption (mixed cycle)
The best fuel-efficient diesel crossovers	1	Citroen DS 4 Crossback	–	6.2 l.
	2	Volvo V40 Cross Country D2	RUB 1,536,106	5.6 L.
	3	MINI COOPER COUNTRYMAN	RUB 1,440,800	5.7 L.
	4	Land Rover Range Rover Evoque	RUB 2,814,000	7.7 L.
	5	Nissan Qashqai	RUB 1,046,990	6.2 L.
	6	AUDI Q3	2,344,000 rubles.	5.5 L.
	7	Peugeot 3008	RUB 1,499,900	6.0 L.
	8	Jaguar F-Pace	RUB 3,405,000	5.3 L.
	9	Mercedes GLA	RUB 1,891,890	5.9 L.
	10	Volkswagen Tiguan	RUB 1,170,000	6.5 L.
The best fuel-efficient gasoline crossovers	1	Porsche Cayenne S e-hybrid	RUB 7,264,000	3.4 L.
	2	BMW X5 40e iPerformance	RUB 4,630,000	3.5 L.
	3	Suzuki Vitara S	8 19100 rub.	5.5 L.
	4	BMW X1	RUB 1,580,000	5.7 L.
	5	SKODA YETI	–	5.8 L.
	6	MITSUBISHI ASX	RUB 863,000	6.1 L.

The best fuel-efficient diesel crossovers

The combination of efficiency and high-torque performance allows diesel engines to compete on an equal footing with gasoline engines. Automakers have managed to solve the problem of noisy operation and vibration, but in terms of heating the passenger compartment, not all cars are doing well. Experts have selected several popular diesel crossovers.

Citroen DS 4 Crossback

Rating: 4.9

A well-known French manufacturer Citroen has created a new brand, which has become independent since 2014. The DS 4 Crossback is a premium crossover that no longer has the usual herringbone on the grille. The car is far from the cheapest in our country, but you can save a lot on diesel fuel. For the Russian market, the French offer two diesel engines.

The most economical is the 1.6-liter turbocharged 120 hp power unit. from. In mixed mode, it consumes only 4.1 liters of diesel fuel, while on the highway this figure reaches 3.8 liters.

The more powerful 2-liter engine produces 180 hp. with., which are distributed by an automatic transmission. Despite the best dynamics, the efficiency of the engine also pleasantly surprises the experts (4.4L combined cycle, 3.8L on the highway).

Advantages

• low consumption;
• good dynamics;
• soft suspension;
• rich equipment.

disadvantages

• high price.

Volvo V40 Cross Country D2

Rating: 4.8

The Swedish car Volvo V40 Cross Country D2 is slightly inferior to the winner of our review in terms of economy. This crossover hatchback is supplied to Russia with a 1.6 liter diesel unit, which is paired with a robotic gearbox. The supercharged engine demonstrates good dynamics, although its power (114 hp) looks modest. The car has a plug-in four-wheel drive, which is an attractive factor for many residents of our country. But due to the low ground clearance (145 mm), experts do not recommend storming off-road. In the combined cycle, the engine consumes 4.1 liters of diesel fuel, on a suburban highway this figure drops to 3.9 liters.

Users have no particular complaints about the car, which allows the crossover to get silver.

Advantages

• plug-in four-wheel drive;
• adaptability to winter operation;
• profitability;
• high-quality assembly.

disadvantages

• small clearance;
• expensive maintenance.

MINI COOPER COUNTRYMAN

Rating: 4.7

Big MINI for a big country. This is how the famous British manufacturer of the COUNTRYMAN crossover is presented in Russia. The model perfectly combines light weight, compact size and power of a diesel engine. Therefore, the car owner will get maximum pleasure from driving both in the city and on the highway. The power unit looks a little more voracious than the review leaders. Depending on the gearbox, the average fuel consumption is 4.7-4.8 liters per 100 kilometers. On the track, you can keep within 4.3 liters. The experts liked the control of the car the most. She implicitly obeys both experienced drivers and novice car enthusiasts.

Fans of the British brand have found a lot in common with BMW X1, on the basis of which COUNTRYMAN was created. But it still has all the zest of the legendary MINI brand.

Advantages

• excellent handling;
• profitability;
• stylish design;
• reliability.

disadvantages

• high price;
• expensive maintenance.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Rating: 4.6

Another legendary Briton was included in our review. This is a crossover with intelligent all-wheel drive Range Rover Evoque of the well-known company Land Rover. The model is famous for its cross-country ability and economical diesel engines. Experts drew attention to two power units that have a volume of 2.0 liters. The 150-horsepower engine behaves somewhat more modestly during acceleration (11.2 s to 100 km / h), but on the other hand, the consumption of diesel fuel in the combined mode is lower (5.7 liters). The more powerful version of the D180 is suitable for sports fans (9.3 s to 100 km / h), while fuel consumption will increase slightly (5.8 liters in a mixed style). Both engines are complemented by a 9-speed transmission.

Owners appreciate the roomy trunk and spacious interior, good cross-country ability and high ground clearance.

Advantages

• excellent cross-country ability;
• luxurious salon;
• roomy trunk;
• reliability.

disadvantages

• high price;
• expensive maintenance.

Nissan Qashqai

Rating: 4.5

The Japanese crossover Nissan Qashqai is successfully assembled in Russia, but today the entire lineup consists of gasoline engines. Before the restyling of the second generation (since 2013), the car lineup included a front-wheel drive version with a small 1.6 liter diesel engine. Thanks to turbocharging, the manufacturer managed not only to improve the acceleration dynamics (11.1 s to 100 km / h), but also to reduce appetite. In mixed mode, the car consumes 4.9 liters of diesel fuel; outside the city, the consumption can be reduced to 4.5 liters. The torque is distributed by a variator, a manual transmission is found only in cars for Europe.

Domestic users liked the crossover for its comfort, stylish design, roomy trunk. Of the minuses, there is a weak undercarriage and a high cost of spare parts.

Advantages

• comfortable lounge;
• high ground clearance;
• strength;
• affordable price.

disadvantages

• expensive spare parts;
• weak undercarriage.

AUDI Q3

Rating: 4.5

In the German crossover AUDI Q3, experts have discovered such advantages as a luxurious finish, excellent acceleration dynamics (7.9 seconds to hundreds) and an economical diesel engine. To complete the all-wheel drive version, the manufacturer chose a 2-liter turbodiesel, which in the combined mode consumes only 5.0 liters of diesel fuel. On an asphalt road, the consumption is 4.4 liters. At the same time, the maximum crossover speed reaches 219 km / h. The equipment also feels good outside the city, when it is necessary to overcome soggy country roads. In the cabin, the driver and passengers feel very comfortable due to effective sound insulation.

The high price did not allow the German car to join the fight for medals. But enthusiastic reviews from Russian motorists helped the model to get into the TOP-6 of our review.

Advantages

• excellent dynamics;
• luxurious salon;
• good cross-country ability;
• high-torque motor.

disadvantages

• high price;
• wadded steering wheel.

Peugeot 3008

Rating: 4.4

The French crossover Peugeot 3008 looks decent in terms of efficiency and design. A diesel version with a capacity of 150 hp is being sold in our country. with., which is equipped with an automatic transmission. A two-liter engine quickly accelerates the car (9.6 seconds to hundreds), the maximum speed limit is 200 km / h. In the combined cycle, the consumption of diesel fuel is 4.8 liters, outside the city the appetite of the engine decreases to 4.4 liters. Experts praised the model for its reliable corrosion protection, the entire body is galvanized. The crossover should include a large ground clearance (180 mm), spaciousness and rich equipment.

Russian motorists, along with the merits, discovered the weaknesses of the model. In the diesel version, the chain mechanism and expensive injection pump are short-lived.

Advantages

• high-spirited motor;
• rich equipment;
• durable body;
• high ground clearance.

disadvantages

• short-lived injection pump and chain mechanism;
• high price.

Jaguar F-Pace

Rating: 4.4

A wide range of motors is offered to Russian consumers when choosing a crossover Jaguar F-Pace. A worthy place is occupied by diesel units, two of which are based on a 2-liter engine. The most economical one consumes 5.3 liters of diesel fuel in mixed mode, accelerating to 208 km / h. If someone is not satisfied with the acceleration dynamics (9.0 s), then you should take a closer look at the more powerful version (240 hp). The twin-turbo engine propels the car from 0-100 km / h in 7.2 seconds, reaching a maximum of 217 km / h. Diesel fuel consumption will rise to 5.8 liters. 3-liter 300 hp engine from. demonstrates rapid acceleration (6.4 s), consuming 6 liters of diesel fuel.

Car owners love the design and sporty character of the car. Disadvantages users consider poor sound insulation, problems with opening doors.

Advantages

• sports character;
• rich selection of motors;
• excellent acceleration dynamics;
• good handling.

disadvantages

• high price;
• poor insulation.

Mercedes GLA

Rating: 4.4

There are also economical diesel vehicles in the premium class. A prime example is the German crossover Mercedes GLA. The manufacturer offers Russian consumers a version with a 2.1 liter power unit with a capacity of 136 or 170 liters. from. The car is equipped with a robotic gearbox, experts consider acceleration to be quite high-spirited (8.3 s). In the combined mode, the car eats about 5.5 liters of diesel fuel, and outside the city the consumption is reduced to 5.1 liters. Inside, everything speaks of the luxury of the car, from high-quality materials to a perfect fit. The high price and small trunk prevented us from climbing higher in our review of the model.

Car owners are pleased with the reliability, agility and luxurious finishes. But for the trouble-free operation of all units, it is necessary to undergo timely maintenance.

Advantages

• high-spirited motor;
• luxurious interior trim;
• reliability;
• recognizable design.

disadvantages

• high price;
• small trunk.

Volkswagen Tiguan

Rating: 4.3

Traditionally, cars Volkswagen with diesel engines have good acceleration dynamics. The Tiguan was no exception. The crossover is equipped with one 2-liter engine, which consumes diesel fuel economically. In mixed mode, the consumption is 6.1 liters, outside the city – 5.1 liters. At the same time, the car accelerates to 100 km / h in 9.3 s. The diesel version comes with automatic transmission and 4MOTION all-wheel drive. Experts speak flatteringly about the rich equipment and modern design of the car, good cross-country ability and high ground clearance (200 mm). The model closes the top ten most economical diesel crossovers.

Car owners like beautiful modern design, reliability, good driving characteristics. But they consider the price too high, there is not enough space in the trunk, the interior heats up for a long time in winter.

Advantages

• good acceleration dynamics;
• beautiful appearance;
• excellent cross-country ability;
• high-quality assembly.

disadvantages

• the interior is heated for a long time in winter;
• high price.

The best fuel-efficient gasoline crossovers

More and more gasoline engines are approaching diesel units in terms of efficiency. Some manufacturers are equipping engines with smart electronics and turbocharging, while others are making hybrid versions. Experts liked the following crossovers.

Porsche Cayenne S e-hybrid

Rating: 4.9

The electric drive industry is developing rapidly in the automotive industry. Fans of sustainable transport will be interested in the crossover Porsche Cayenne S e-hybrid. The manufacturer has carried out a deep modernization of the hybrid of the previous generation, increasing the power of the electric motor from 34 to 70 kW. It also became possible to recharge the battery from the outlet. Despite the high total power of the power plant, the average gasoline consumption is only 3.4 liters per 100 kilometers. On electric traction, the crossover can travel up to 36 km in warm weather, at -25 ° C this figure is reduced to 16 km.

All these technical characteristics allowed the experts to give the gold of our review to the German car. But the cost of a hybrid is still out of reach for most Russians.

Advantages

• profitability;
• the battery charges quickly;
• not afraid of frost;
• luxurious finishes.

disadvantages

• high price.

BMW X5 40e iPerformance

Rating: 4.8

The combination of comfort and high cross-country ability allowed the Bavarian crossover BMW X5 xDrive40e iPerformance to take second place. On the battery, the model is capable of covering up to 30 km. In AUTO eDrive mode, the system chooses which motor to turn on for maximum fuel economy. It could be a 245 hp gasoline engine. from. or an electric motor (75 HP). Experts consider the car an excellent option for driving in a metropolis, the average consumption in the city is about 3.4-3.5 l / 100 km. In the mixed mode, more gasoline is consumed (6.0-6.5 liters), and outside the city the consumption reaches 10.5-11.0 liters.

So far, during testing, experts have identified such shortcomings as a low mileage on the battery during fast starts (up to 17 km) and a slow recovery of the battery capacity.

Advantages

• innovative technologies;
• quick start on electric traction;
• economical consumption in the city;
• comfort.

disadvantages

• high price;
• long battery charging.

Suzuki Vitara S

Rating: 4.7

The first car with a turbocharged gasoline engine from a well-known Japanese manufacturer Suzuki was the Vitara S crossover. Small in volume (1.4 liters), the engine has a decent power (140 hp), which was made possible by turbocharging. At the same time, fuel consumption has also decreased, so in the combined cycle the car consumes 5.5 liters of gasoline, and outside the city only 5.0 liters. The front-wheel drive version demonstrates enviable acceleration dynamics (9.5 seconds), and the maximum speed reaches 200 km / h. Experts have tested the car and off-road, in difficult conditions the engine lacks power at the bottom.

Users praise the good dynamics, decent equipment and stylish design. Of the weaknesses, there is a wobbly steering wheel and a lack of power when driving off-road.

Advantages

• dynamic acceleration;
• stylish design;
• good sound insulation;
• warms up quickly in winter.

disadvantages

• soft rear arches;
• roll rudder.

BMW X1

Rating: 4.6

The German crossover BMW X1 boasts economical gas mileage (5.6 liters on the highway, 6.3 liters in combined mode). The Bavarian car traditionally accelerates well (9.7 s), although a small engine (1.5 l) is installed under the hood. But the car is produced only with an automatic transmission. In terms of appearance, the crossover is on top, the design is aggressive and sporty, as befits BMW. The experts liked the car's excellent handling and reliable suspension. But the cabin is cramped, and budget materials are used in the decoration.

Domestic car owners liked the crossover for its compactness, fast acceleration, and road stability. On the downside, they include rear-wheel drive (in some modifications), expensive maintenance.

Advantages

• sports character;
• stylish design;
• excellent handling;
• high-quality assembly.

disadvantages

• cramped interior;
• expensive maintenance.

SKODA YETI

Rating: 4.5

The Czech compact crossover SKODA YETI was discontinued in 2018, but this economical car can still be purchased in some car dealerships in Russia. The manufacturer equipped it with various gasoline engines, the most economical of which is the 1.4 liter version with 125 hp. from. Combined with a manual transmission, the vehicle has a combined fuel consumption of 5.8 liters and 5.0 liters on the highway. Ample opportunities on the road are guaranteed by four-wheel drive, and the convertible salon allows you to transport bulky loads. Experts note the high ground clearance even when the vehicle is fully loaded.

The owners speak flatteringly about good dynamics, efficiency, good cross-country ability. To the minuses of the crossover, they include a weak suspension, prolonged heating of the cabin in winter.

Advantages

• spacious salon;
• high ground clearance;
• high-quality interior trim;
• affordable price.

disadvantages

• the salon heats up for a long time;
• weak suspension.

MITSUBISHI ASX

Rating: 4.4

The Japanese crossover MITSUBISHI ASX can be purchased at an affordable price in Russia. The car is equipped with a 1.6 liter gasoline engine that produces 117 hp. from. Despite the modest technical characteristics, the car accelerates well (11.4 seconds) and uses fuel economically (6.1 liters combined cycle, 5.0 liters on the highway). The experts appreciated the high ground clearance (195 mm), high-quality interior trim. Unfortunately, the most economical version comes with front-wheel drive only. The crossover closes the TOP-6 of our review.

Russian motorists like the car's appearance, affordable price, good visibility and maneuverability. As for the shortcomings, most often the owners criticize the car for ineffective noise insulation, stiff suspension and a cramped interior (especially at the back).

Advantages

• maneuverability;
• stylish design;
• reliability;
• good overview.

disadvantages

• poor sound insulation;
• rigid suspension.

---

Attention! This rating is subjective and does not constitute an advertisement and does not serve as a purchase guide. Before buying, you need to consult with a specialist.