7 best heaters for a bath

Review of the best according to the editors. About the selection criteria. The the material is subjective, is not advertising and is not serves as a guide to the purchase. Before purchase is needed consultation with a specialist.

Many owners of private houses in Russia erect on their sections of the bath. This building is not just for washing, but for healing and spiritual pastime. In the process building a bath is important to pay close attention thermal insulation. Since the inside is quite aggressive conditions for building material (high humidity, differential temperatures), then not every insulation experts recommend use. When buying, experts advise you to consider several important moments.

How to choose a heater for a bath

  1. The environmental friendliness of insulation comes to the fore today. It must not release harmful compounds under the influence of moisture, nor under the influence of heat. Considered the most harmless heat insulators based on natural materials.
  2. Since there is an open fire in a traditional Russian bath, then to finish the stove and the room in which it is placed, it is necessary use fireproof heat insulators.
  3. It is necessary to choose a heater taking into account its longevity. It should not crumble or delaminate when sudden changes in temperature or contact with water.
  4. In the bath there is a high level of humidity. Considering high temperature, preference should be given to insulation, resistant to cold water and superheated steam.
  5. For each stage of the construction of the bath, you should choose the most optimal material. For example, fill the voids between logs log house is best with the help of interventional insulation. And for floor or attic insulation is expanded clay or mineral cotton wool.
  6. Post-finish options should also be considered. baths. If it is planned to apply plaster and paint outside, then A popular polystyrene will do. And under a wooden lining it is more convenient mount a thin foil insulation.
  7. There are many suitable bath houses on the market. heat insulators, which differ significantly in price. But in pursuit for momentary benefits, it is important not to forget about the subsequent costs of installation and maintenance. For example, mineral wool retain heat-insulating properties only with a competent device steam and waterproofing. And this will require additional financial attachments.

We have selected 7 best heaters for a bath. All of them actively used in Russia for outdoor and indoor thermal insulation. When distributing places in the rating, the opinion was taken into account expert community, as well as reviews of builders and users.

Rating of the best heaters for a bath

Nomination a place Insulation rating
Rating of the best heaters for a bath 1 Interventional insulation 5.0
2 Foil insulation 4.9
3 Basalt insulation 4.8
4 Mineral wool 4.7
5 Foam glass 4.6
6 Styrofoam 4.5
7 Expanded clay 4.4

Interventional insulation

Rating: 5.0

Interventional insulation.jpg

Traditional Russian baths are made from a wooden log house. For wall insulation at the construction stage is used interventional insulation. This heat insulator becomes the winner of our ranking for a number of reasons. The most important of them, experts consider homogeneous structure and high density of the material. He is graduated in the form of tapes, the thickness of which varies over a wide range (4-15 mm). Interventional insulation fills all pores, forming a reliable barrier to cold air and moisture.

Domestic builders like to work with tape jute. It is easy to install, you just need to roll it on a log and fix with construction brackets. Of the shortcomings of the insulation stiffness and brittleness of the fibers is noted, in case of their fracture thermal insulation properties are deteriorating.

Advantages

  • homogeneous structure;
  • affordable price;
  • ease of use;
  • effective thermal insulation.

disadvantages

  • brittle fibers.

Foil insulation

Rating: 4.9

Foil insulation.png

Widespread use in the baths is foil insulation. is he used for thermal insulation of the ceiling inside the steam room, as decoration material for the chimney. In addition to preserving heat and light indoor, creating a fire resistant layer, foil insulation prevents the penetration of noise. At the same time, experts note the fineness of the material, which allows to save internal space. Second place in the ranking due to the appearance of corrosion on the foil layer. Therefore, additional processing is required. metal surface with anticorrosive composition.

Builders are pleased with the low weight of the insulation, the convenience in work, environmental friendliness and hygiene of the material. The only minus is the need for applying paintwork material on the foil.

Advantages

  • small thickness;
  • effective heat and sound insulation;
  • ease;
  • environmental friendliness.

disadvantages

  • low corrosion resistance.

Basalt insulation

Rating: 4.8

Basalt insulation.jpg

It is very popular in the construction of baths in our Basalt insulation country. Experts consider it the main advantages environmental friendliness and safety. Natural material not flammable, does not emit harmful compounds, has resistance to moisture. The service life of basalt exceeds 30 years, while high heat and noise insulation qualities. During operation the basalt layer does not attract insects and rodents. Thermal insulation withstands severe temperature extremes and humidity. Basalt insulation receives the bronze of our rating, the scope of its application is limited by the high price.

Construction experts praise simple installation, versatility of the material. The disadvantages of basalt are carry a large weight of insulation.

Advantages

  • environmental friendliness;
  • durability;
  • fire resistance;
  • universality.

disadvantages

  • high price;
  • a lot of weight.

Mineral wool

Rating: 4.7

Mineral wool .jpg

More recently, mineral wool was the undisputed leader among thermal insulation materials in Russia. According to experts, she continues to maintain a leading position in the market and in our rating due to affordable price, fire resistance and resistance to biodefeat. In addition, the material shows good soundproof properties. As for the disadvantages of mineral wool, the main problem is the loss of beneficial qualities when wet. Because of this, it is necessary to additionally use hydro- and vapor barrier to increase the life of mineral wool.

Russian builders know everything about mineral wool, about the intricacies of installation this material and applications. In addition to the steam room, heat insulator can be used in all rooms, if contact with water.

Advantages

  • affordable price;
  • simple installation;
  • fire resistance;
  • resistance to biodefeat.

disadvantages

  • low moisture resistance;
  • harmful to respiratory and visual organs.

Foam glass

Rating: 4.6

Foamglass2.jpg

One of the most modern heat insulators in the domestic The building materials market is considered foamglass. Experts predict him great future, increasing annual sales confirm the bold forecast. While the limiting factor remains high price, which was reflected in the position in our ranking. However material has important characteristics such as environmental friendliness, resistance to temperature extremes, moisture, acids and organic solvents. The heat insulator does not attract rodents and insects, there is no soil for the development of mold or fungi. It’s better total foam glass is suitable for insulation of the bath indoors.

Users managed to appreciate the strength of the insulation, ease of installation, harmless to the human body.

Advantages

  • high strength;
  • environmental friendliness;
  • resistance to moisture and temperature extremes;
  • resistance to biodefeat.

disadvantages

  • high price.

Styrofoam

Rating: 4.5

Polyfoam.jpg

The most favorite insulation among domestic users is Styrofoam. It is used in the construction of residential buildings, garages and baths. But experts warn of some limitations in use. An unpleasant feature of the foam is the release of phenol-containing compounds, this is observed at high temperatures. The material burns well, which is also negative factor when warming the bath. But for moisture resistance and simplicity Installation insulation is in the TOP-6 of our rating. It can be use for exterior decoration of the walls of the bath.

Users praise insulation for an affordable price. Technology polyfoam installation worked out by our builders to the smallest detail. The material is easy to cut, it has a small weight, in the seams between plates are filled with construction foam.

Advantages

  • low price;
  • moisture resistance;
  • ease;
  • easy installation.

disadvantages

  • narrow scope;
  • flammability.

Expanded clay

Rating: 4.4

Expanded clay2.jpg

Expanded clay remains the best bulk insulation for a bath. His scope Usually limited to floor and attic premises. The material is not afraid of moisture, rodents do not like it, it does not microorganisms develop. Experts also emphasize such insulator strengths like low cost, durability and environmental friendliness. As for the shortcomings, first of all it should be noted the inconvenience of movement and installation. If in the attic it is enough to sprinkle expanded clay with an even layer, then when installing the floor more often it is added to the concrete mix. Material loses its properties with damage to the granules.

Users are attracted by the low price of the heat insulator, harmlessness and durability. But builders do not like to drag bags with expanded clay in the attic.

Advantages

  • low price;
  • environmental friendliness;
  • durability;
  • moisture resistance.

disadvantages

  • limited scope;
  • inconvenience of installation.


Attention! This rating is subjective, is not advertising and does not serve as a guide to the purchase. Before the purchase consultation with a specialist is necessary.

Rate article
An online magazine about style, fashion, etiquette, lifestyle, and about choosing the best products and services.
Leave a Reply