Review of the best according to the editors. About the selection criteria. The the material is subjective, is not advertising and is not serves as a guide to the purchase. Before purchase is needed consultation with a specialist.
Fundamental differences in sports headphones, which is why they are allocated in a separate group, two. A person moves – that means Headphones should be lightweight and not be uncomfortable. AND, since he is moving actively, they must also be good protected from moisture: in the gym a person sweats and on the street jogging can get in the rain.
However, autonomy begins to conflict with compactness: with it’s hard to make friends with the built-in battery high capacity. Therefore, when choosing wireless headphones for sports must also take into account battery life: when same battery capacity different models with the same power supply capacity can demonstrate noticeably different working hours.
And, of course, sound is also important: no matter how reliable and “long-playing” wireless headphones were not, the purchase will not deliver a lot of joy if the music in them does not sound like like.
- Rating of the best wireless headphones for sports
- The best budget sports wireless headphones
- Samsung EO-BG950 U Flex
- Creative outlier sports
- JBL Reflect Contour 2
- Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305
- Meizu EP52
- Koss BT190i
- Honor AM61
- Best High-End Sports Wireless Headphones
- Beats Powerbeats Pro
- Aftershokz aeropex
- Jabra Elite Active 65t
- JBL Under Armor True Wireless Flash
- AfterShokz Trekz Titanium
Rating of the best wireless headphones for sports
|Nomination||a place||Name of product||price|
|The best budget sports wireless headphones||1||Samsung EO-BG950 U Flex||2 999 rub.|
|2||Creative outlier sports||3 315 rub.|
|3||JBL Reflect Contour 2||3 015 rub.|
|4||Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305||1 999 rub.|
|5||Meizu EP52||2 400 rub.|
|6||Koss BT190i||2 315 rub.|
|7||Honor AM61||1 739 rub.|
|Best High-End Sports Wireless Headphones||1||Beats Powerbeats Pro||13 980 rub.|
|2||Aftershokz aeropex||12 591 rub.|
|3||Jabra Elite Active 65t||7 990 rub.|
|4||JBL Under Armor True Wireless Flash||9 990 rub.|
|5||AfterShokz Trekz Titanium||6 015 rub.|
The best budget sports wireless headphones
Samsung EO-BG950 U Flex
The U Flex headphones are a qualitative improvement over previous Samsung models – increased mechanical strength (the headset can be bent at an angle even more straight without consequences), the sound quality has increased due to the use of Scalable Audio technology first introduced by Korean the company is in this model of sports headphones. With bad This technology neatly reduces bitrate to save connection stability: there will be no interruption of sound (“stuttering”). However, it is worth noting that sound transmission technology in high quality like aptX and aptX HD are not supported here, therefore in comparison with more expensive and “musical” wireless U Flex headphones lose – but in their price range they perform well, here we agree with the reviews of the owners.
The headset weighs only 51 grams, with most of it concentrated at the base, the inserts themselves are light and comfortable. Fit ergonomics “for you” (and at the same time improve the sound: from the right the selection of ear cushions it depends on vacuum headphones very much) allow three pairs of interchangeable ear pads in the kit.
The built-in battery is small, but the manufacturer claims time battery life up to 10 hours. In practice, at an acceptable level volume this time will average 8-9 hours, which can be considered a good result: the charge is guaranteed to be enough for training, and on the way home. A USB cable is used for charging.
- Convenience, including on the run;
- Good water resistance;
- High battery life;
- Presence of a programmable button via a standard application quick action;
- Lack of support for aptX.
Creative outlier sports
Creative headphones don’t have a collar connecting them – only flexible cable on which a very compact unit with Bluetooth module and battery. Thanks to this, the mass succeeded reduce to extremely small: only 15 grams. Battery capacity expectedly small – 150 mAh, but the manufacturer claims time battery life up to 11 hours. What is especially nice – headphones support aptX.
Profitability achieved primarily by limiting power Bluetooth module: a stable connection is maintained at a distance not more than 3 meters from the source. But at the same time, the acoustic path: enough volume, low frequencies are well worked out, which for 6mm drivers is very nice in itself. At listening to music (and support for aptX will be of interest lovers of quality sound) will be primarily noticeable poor study of the “tops” in the sound – this is partly due to the very limitations of software compression of the communication protocol, partially – and with the design of the headphones. But in its price category Headphones can compete with competitors with confidence.
The controls are very simple: two adjustment buttons volume along the edges of the remote control and the pause button (it also allows you to answer on a call). It’s not difficult to use them by touch, unless for thumbs remote may seem a little small.
- Compact and very light weight;
- Support aptX;
- Hard case included.
- Small radius of Bluetooth;
- Lack of detail in high frequencies in music;
- Weak ear cushions on the speakers.
JBL Reflect Contour 2
Structurally, headphones from JBL are in many ways similar to Creative: only slightly heavier (18 grams versus 15), drivers are slightly smaller in diameter (5.8 mm). Battery life is comparable supports fast recharging (15 minutes of charging per hour of work). However, one should immediately note the lack of support for aptX to transfer sound with a minimum of quality loss, as well as a thin connecting cable – unlike Creative, where thick silicone shell, JBL headphones will require more accurate treatment.
Headphones oriented to background music and use in headset quality – with more careful listening to sound an overabundance of high frequencies and a lack of bottoms becomes apparent. To improve the reliability of fastening, earhooks are used, therefore we can advise you to try on headphones if possible: not everyone The mount will be comfortable.
- Reliable mount on the ears;
- Good water resistance;
- Long battery life.
- Average sound quality
- Thin patch cable.
Plantronics BackBeat FIT 305
The creators of these headphones have not forgotten about the clothespin on the cable – strange, but neither Creative nor JBL has this, although the cost price this piece of plastic is small. But they made her weak: for many owners for reviews, it quickly breaks. Headphones themselves by weight outperformed both competitors: 14 grams versus 15 and 18, respectively. However, the struggle with weight has also led to a significant reduction in operating time. on one charge: up to 6 hours.
The remote control has three control buttons, shifted to one of the edges. Because of this, it is convenient for people with thin fingers, for large people management is harder.
Headphones do not support modern sound transmission technology in high quality (aptX, aptX HD). The sound spectrum focuses on low frequencies, highs are poorly detailed and moved to the rear sound stage plan. This will appeal to fans of simple electronic music, for more complex instrumental compositions sounding is insufficient.
Three pairs of silicone ear pads of different sizes are included. Mid-size already installed. With the right size the sound insulation level of the headphones is good, keep in the ear they sink reliably.
- Good moisture protection;
- Light weight.
- Compared with competitors, short run time on one charging;
- Unreliable clip fixing wires.
Chinese manufacturer traditionally offers good features at an affordable price: music transfer to high quality aptX protocol, weighing 22 grams headphones provide autonomy up to 8 hours. Headphone Drivers – ten millimeters, albeit in more expensive models like us indicated above, often used six-millimeter. Battery 130 milliampere-hours of capacity built into a thickening rubber temples, in a symmetrically located thickening on the other side located control panel. There is also a microphone, because of which, according owner reviews, voice quality during a call average, but friction on clothes is distinctly audible.
Replaceable ear pads – four pairs. Headphone Housing made of brushed aluminum – although it slightly lifted the weight, but the headphones look more expensive. Neodymium hidden under the covers magnets that allow you to interlock between their ears removed headphones.
The sound of the headphones can be called interesting: a good balance frequencies, a decent level of detail for budget headphones. All spoils build quality: many reviews indicate problems with reliability – therefore, we do not give a high rating for this model we can.
- Good sound
- Decent battery life on a single charge.
- Reliability issues;
- Bad location of microphone and remote control.
Headphones from a famous American brand attract attention eighties cosmooper design but balance characteristics they can not be called successful: they weigh 65 grams (more than any of the above models), but at the same time in they installed a small battery, which is why the declared operating time at 6 hours, according to owners, is not really aged: at normal volume, a maximum of one and a half to two hours.
Overweight is concentrated in the remote control, which is installed on the cable asymmetrically – because of this, the same owners indicate that headphones there is a problem with the “advantage”, well-felt. Special this is unpleasant, given that the model is positioned as a sports – with active movement, the remote control will hang out (clothespins for wire no), trying to pull the earpiece out of his ear.
The sound quality is not bad considering that the headphones are not support aptX. But, nevertheless, we definitely cannot to give these headphones a high rating: the problem first not even with ergonomic miscalculations, but with reliability: too a lot of negative reviews about breakdowns.
- Good moisture protection;
- Decent study of sound.
- Ergonomic issues
- Low reliability;
- Short run time on a single charge.
The manufacturer, indicating the specifications of the headphones, cheated: only the weight of an individual earphone (5 grams) is indicated, and not the whole structure as a whole. The battery was able to enter a good capacity (135 mAh). However, the design is symmetrical (therefore does not cause such problems with an advantage as Koss), drivers used 11 mm, which could potentially give a good sound.
However, Honor has many shortcomings – both in the characteristics themselves, and in reviews of the owners. The manufacturer honestly indicates the level IP52 dust and water protection – and this is not so much: the ones listed above models it is at the IPX4-IPX5 level. 11mm drivers on the very in fact, alas, they can’t give out good bass – on the contrary, the owners overly accentuated highs are noted. Could consider that the characteristics are simply biased towards use headphones as a headset, but to talk with them is not especially convenient because of the quiet and noisy microphone.
To the manufacturer’s credit, there are fewer problems with the reliability of the headphones. by reviews than the more famous and expensive Koss, and battery life more work – up to 10 hours.
- Good build quality for this price;
- Long work on one charge.
- Low moisture protection;
- The sound is poorly designed.
Best High-End Sports Wireless Headphones
Beats Powerbeats Pro
Powerbeats Pro is a true wireless headset with no external battery and connecting wire. For use in sports in this design, the reliability of fixation in the ears is important – after all A pop-up earphone will not stay hanging on the wire, but inevitably will fall. The owners of AirPods have already had a good time getting to know this – the first true wireless headphones to hit the market. Therefore, Beats the design of the arches is well developed: they securely cover the ear, with the correct selection of ear pads, the headphones are fixed firmly and do not cause discomfort.
We remembered about AirPods for a reason: in Beats headphones Used the same Apple H1 chip. Hence the obvious similarities: focus on the “apple” technique (even in the charger Lightning connector used), lack of aptX support: the point is that the protocol is being developed and maintained by the company Qualcomm competing for Apple (Android devices).
Despite the small weight of the headphones (20 grams each), from them managed to achieve high autonomy: battery charge economically consumed, and with their small capacity, headphones can work up to 9 hours. The charge of the case (which, in turn, charges the headphones when they are laid there) enough for 24 hours.
Despite the same “stuffing” similar to AirPods, they sound Powerbeats Pro is noticeably different: better midrange, the sound is perceived more convex. Bass (which is unusual for Beats) not overly emphasized – as a result, we can recognize the headphones universal in genre preferences, it sounds good and electronic music, and instrumental.
- Long working time on one charge;
- Sound quality;
- Reliable fixation in the ears;
- Full integration with Apple devices.
- Large dimensions of the charging case;
- Using the Lightning Connector.
These headphones can be safely called structurally unique: instead of conventional vacuum inserts with dynamic drivers, they use bone conduction technology to transmit sound directly to the inner ear. Accordingly, thanks to AfterShokz headphones can be recommended for people with hearing problems – where ordinary headphones do not pay off, this model will allow you to fully hear music and talk on the telephone. People with normal hearing retain full perception. ambient sounds: headphones do not interfere with communication, when running on the street do not create the effect of “acoustic vacuum”, which could become unsafe (harder to hear approaching vehicles). If you just need isolation from external sounds, which the headphones themselves cannot provide for themselves, then in this case the kit is included ordinary ear plugs. However, due to the specifics of sound transmission in headphones and features of human hearing the emphasis of sound strongly changing: the share of low frequencies rises, the high ones are lost. therefore we will advise listening to music exactly as intended manufacturer – with open ears.
Dust and moisture protection class – IP67, headphones are not able to transfer only sweat or drizzling rain, but also direct fall into the water. Built-in battery has a capacity of 145 mAh, battery life work – up to 8 hours. The charging connector is proprietary (which allowed provide a high class of water protection), but in case of loss The original cable will be a problem. The manufacturer resolved the issue. simple: the kit also has a spare cable for charging.
- Excellent moisture protection;
- Ability to use by people having problems with by hearing.
- Lack of own sound insulation, which is not always conveniently;
- Problems with the reliability of sound emitters (according to reviews).
Jabra Elite Active 65t
After the release of AirPods, the appeared fashion for true wireless headphones led to the fact that they appeared in many manufacturers. But if the same Beats directly used the Apple element base, then Jabra Elite Active 65t has become a standalone development.
Headphones turned out very light (6.5 grams right, 5.8 grams – left: in practice, this difference is imperceptible). But because of this the capacity of the built-in batteries has also suffered: they will last no more than 5 hours of work. These headphones are charged, as befits true wireless, when stacking in a complete case charge, your own which also has less energy than Beats (up to 10 extra hours).
Each headphone uses two microphones (like Beats) – this allows you to better filter the noise. Also implemented useful possibility – at the touch of a button you can turn on the transmission ambient sounds from microphones to headphone drivers, they are not need to be removed to answer the question. Another one feature – the presence of built-in accelerometers: since the headphones sports, then they are made at the same time and compatible with fitness tracking in the mobile application.
The protection level is IP56, and the manufacturer gives a two-year warranty for damage caused by the penetration of sweat. But, to Unfortunately, owners note a weak fixation in the ears – and this is for sports headphones a serious miscalculation.
- Good sound;
- Noise reduction during a telephone conversation;
- Light weight;
- The ability to listen to the surroundings without taking off headphones.
- Unsuccessful mechanism for opening the charging case;
- Weak attachment in the ear.
JBL Under Armor True Wireless Flash
Another representative of true wireless headphones, this time from JBL, made with good moisture protection (IPX7), so for classes sports in this regard fits perfectly: no sweat, no accidental fall When running on the street after rain, the headphones are not afraid of water. Autonomy – up to five hours (built-in batteries – at 110 mAh each), another five charges gives a branded case (which because of the capacious one and a half ampere-hour battery, however, has become overall and weighty). The headphones themselves due to the dimensions look weighty, but each one actually has a mass of just 15 grams: over two times larger than the Jabra, but smaller than the Beats.
Built-in microphones allowed to realize two useful functions. The first, TalkThru, is similar to that used by Jabra Hearthrough: you can hear the voice of the interlocutor without removing the earphone, and external noise picked up by microphones will be filtered out. Second Ambient Aware, transmits the entire spectrum of sounds “outside”, allowing for safety to reduce the degree of sound insulation.
The ear pads in the kit are actually two sets: regular and special “sports”, with an additional ledge for more reliable ear retention.
- A good selection of ear pads included;
- Light weight;
- Good moisture protection.
- Large and heavy case charging;
- Tight control buttons.
AfterShokz Trekz Titanium
These headphones, like Aeropex from the same company, are used for sound transmission bone conduction technology therefore about the pros and we will not repeat the minuses of the sound itself: for both models they are identical. The difference between the models in a few moments. For the beginning, Trekz Titanium has weaker moisture protection (IP55 vs IP67), they should not be dropped. Less built-in capacity battery, therefore, battery life is less (up to 6 hours according to the manufacturer).
The sound of the Trekz Titanium is specific – the bass is strong, while due to the very design of the headphones is accompanied by tangible “infranizami” by vibration. Mids worked fine, but the top part of the spectrum is already not enough, and the proportion of HF is very much dependent from how exactly the headphones are put on the head: different conduction of bone to the inner ear. In this regard, Aeropex made better – they came out later, taking into account already gained experience.
- Good moisture protection;
- Ability to use for hearing problems.
- Specific sound transmission.
Attention! This rating is subjective, is not advertising and does not serve as a guide to the purchase. Before the purchase consultation with a specialist is necessary.